Adapting this steek to real life--tricks and tips
converting a purl column to be a knit column on the reverse stockinette (purl) face of the fabric |
The facings are anchored into the garment though a purl column (purl as seen from the smooth side of stockinette fabric). To get the tightest possible purl column, don't actually knit the purl column at the time of making the garment.
Instead, work the entire fabric in stockinette.
Afterwards, locate, then drop (run out) the correct column, making a ladder (dark green).
Flip the fabric. Working from the reverse stockinette (bumpy) side use a crochet hook to ladder the run back up as a knit column (darker green). The opposite of a knit column is a purl, so on the front (smooth side) of the fabric, this trick creates a purl column.
This trick of running out a column and hooking it back up from the reverse is called "converting" a column. The purl columns in the original post were converted using this trick. Just don't drop the ladder so far that the foundation stitch(es) come loose.
If converting a column on an existing garment, then once you have live loops at the top or bottom of the column to be run out (more on this below) you can convert the purl column either working bottom-up, or from the neck down, whichever is most convenient. In stockinette, working against the direction of the original work (i.e.: bottom-up in a top-down knit or top-down in a bottom-up knit) amounts only to a half-stitch difference, a difference very nearly undetectable.
ADDING A FACED STEEK to an EXISTING GARMENT
If using this method to add a faced steek to an already-created garment, the first issue is to get live stitches, and the second issue is whether you want the top and bottom bands to cover the steeked front bands (called a "discontinuous front band") or whether you prefer to have the front bands run all the way from top to bottom ("continuous front band"). (Of course, a hybrid front band is also possible--different at the top than the bottom.)
What if your garment is made in a textured pattern? Let's look at the original chart from the previous post (click to enlarge).
In addition to converting the purl column, you might want to consider converting the columns in your garment which correspond to columns 18 and 5, as well as the 14/15/16 set and the 7/8/9 set. This will yield a smooth front band. It also surrounds the (converted) purl columns (17 and 6) with stockinette fabric, thus assuring that these columns recede into the surrounding stockinette fabric, the better to hide the anchor anchored-in facing stitches. There is no reason to convert the 12/13 columns, nor the 10/11 columns, they will be hidden inside the steek-tube.
WIDTH
The spacing above yields the narrowest faced steek which will remain structurally stable in use. However, nothing stops you from making the outer facing wider. On the chart, this meansadding additional columns between columns 7/8 as well as between 15/16. There's no need to add additional columns between 10/11 and 12/13, two columns to curl under, either side of the cut is sufficient. However, you would need to knit more rows on the inner facing to match the width of the now-wider outer facing.
This trick of running out a column and hooking it back up from the reverse is called "converting" a column. The purl columns in the original post were converted using this trick. Just don't drop the ladder so far that the foundation stitch(es) come loose.
If converting a column on an existing garment, then once you have live loops at the top or bottom of the column to be run out (more on this below) you can convert the purl column either working bottom-up, or from the neck down, whichever is most convenient. In stockinette, working against the direction of the original work (i.e.: bottom-up in a top-down knit or top-down in a bottom-up knit) amounts only to a half-stitch difference, a difference very nearly undetectable.
ADDING A FACED STEEK to an EXISTING GARMENT
If using this method to add a faced steek to an already-created garment, the first issue is to get live stitches, and the second issue is whether you want the top and bottom bands to cover the steeked front bands (called a "discontinuous front band") or whether you prefer to have the front bands run all the way from top to bottom ("continuous front band"). (Of course, a hybrid front band is also possible--different at the top than the bottom.)
For a discontinuous front band, remove the existing neck and bottom band, thus exposing live stitches along the garment edge. Next, the purl (anchor) column would be converted from an existing knit column, per above. The front bands (i.e.: the faced steek) would be added next. After the front bands have been added, the bottom and neck bands would be re-knit, picking up stitches right through the bottom and top edges of the steek. This seals the steek-tube shut and lays the neck and bottom bands over the front bands. In the illustration to the left, the top- and bottom-band stitches picked up through the facings are indicated by in red.
For a continuous front band, you would steek right through the existing bottom and neck band. Best would be to undo the bind off at both top and bottom bands and put these on holders--this gives you the necessary live loops for the purl column conversion, as well as setting the stage for prettier bind off. Once the original band stitches are on a holder, the next step is to convert the purl column (either from the top or the bottom, makes no difference). After the steek and its facings are completed, the top and the bottom of the steek would be open, as indicated by the red stars on the illustration to the right. To close them, you'd pick up stitches through the ends of the steek--in other words, through both layers of the facing, both top and bottom, then bind off these newly-picked up stitches in one continuous line with the band bind-off. This creates one uniform line of bind-off at bottom and top edge, while at the same time closing the top and bottom of the open steek tube.
What if your garment is made in a textured pattern? Let's look at the original chart from the previous post (click to enlarge).
In addition to converting the purl column, you might want to consider converting the columns in your garment which correspond to columns 18 and 5, as well as the 14/15/16 set and the 7/8/9 set. This will yield a smooth front band. It also surrounds the (converted) purl columns (17 and 6) with stockinette fabric, thus assuring that these columns recede into the surrounding stockinette fabric, the better to hide the anchor anchored-in facing stitches. There is no reason to convert the 12/13 columns, nor the 10/11 columns, they will be hidden inside the steek-tube.
WIDTH
The spacing above yields the narrowest faced steek which will remain structurally stable in use. However, nothing stops you from making the outer facing wider. On the chart, this meansadding additional columns between columns 7/8 as well as between 15/16. There's no need to add additional columns between 10/11 and 12/13, two columns to curl under, either side of the cut is sufficient. However, you would need to knit more rows on the inner facing to match the width of the now-wider outer facing.
BUTTONS, BUTTONHOLES and ALTERNATE CLOSURES
If you use faced steeks to make the front bands on a cardigan, you can simply sew buttons on one side, no problem. Buttonholes are a bit more complicated.
If you use faced steeks to make the front bands on a cardigan, you can simply sew buttons on one side, no problem. Buttonholes are a bit more complicated.
Option 1: consider machine-made buttonholes. Commercially-knit Norwegian-type sweaters often employ this trick. Most sewing machines with a button-hole function can handle knitwear, especially if you use a ball-pointed machine needle meant for knits and loosen up the tension so the feed dogs don't catch the yarn. HOWEVER, TRY THIS ON A SWATCH FIRST (or get an experienced seamstress to do it for you!)
If you do choose this option, perhaps widen the bands per above,, so that the buttonholes need go through only two layers (the inner and outer facings) avoiding the curled ends caught inside.
Option 2: This post shows several different ways of adding buttonholes after the fact such as slip-stitch loop buttonholes, or attached I-cord loop buttonholes. The post also shows alternatives to buttonholes such as buttons with snaps underneath--you still get the button look, but no need for button holes.
Option 3: alternate closures. Here is a post which shows all kinds of alternatives to buttonholes: toggles, clasps, etc. In fact, ornamented pewter or even silver clasps are the traditional method for closing blind-banded sweaters.
Option 4: For real knit-in buttonholes, you'd make the standard narrow facing, then extending the facing PAST the steek and knitting real buttonholes into this extension--see below.
FRONT BAND EXTENSIONS
Suppose, on the grand finale step for making faced steeks, you did not bind off the inner facing loops through the stabilized edge. Suppose, instead, that as you withdrew the waste yarn, stitch by stitch, you pulled one live loop from the inner facing through the corresponding stitch in the stabilized edge as the waste yarn came out. The result would look like this:
Suppose, on the grand finale step for making faced steeks, you did not bind off the inner facing loops through the stabilized edge. Suppose, instead, that as you withdrew the waste yarn, stitch by stitch, you pulled one live loop from the inner facing through the corresponding stitch in the stabilized edge as the waste yarn came out. The result would look like this:
Facing stitches pulled through the stabilized edge, including a close-up of the live loops |
Now there's a series of live loops, and, wow--whenever knitting features live loops these allow all sorts of creativity. Here, those live loops would make a lovely base for a front band extension. In other words, once you've drawn the live loops of the facing through the stabilized edge, you would then continue knitting the front band on these loops, each row running the entire length of the front band, using the same yarn as you used for the facing. If you used a non-curling stitch like garter stitch, and a one-row buttonhole like the Tulips buttonhole, the below illustration shows the result.
Tulips buttonhole on a front band extension. Here, the extension is bound off in the mc, but it could have been bound off in the cc of the extension |
To get very fancy, consider a fold-over facing extension, with or without the mc for the fold-line. Into the resulting double-layer buttonhole band, you can make really pretty buttonholes by lining up waste-yarn buttonholes on both fabric faces of the extension, as below.
Remove the waste yarn to get live stitches as below.
If you work the two buttonholes closed together, the final result would be as below.**
Naturally, with front band extensions, you'd want to make the garment fronts narrower to allow for this wider band. Conversely, if your garment had somehow come out too narrow, you could widen it via a front band extension, one on each garment front, which is a heck of a good trick to know.***
Naturally, with front band extensions, you'd want to make the garment fronts narrower to allow for this wider band. Conversely, if your garment had somehow come out too narrow, you could widen it via a front band extension, one on each garment front, which is a heck of a good trick to know.***
ZIPPERS
If you consider inserting a zipper my no-sew way, you'll see that the zipper flange fits very very neatly between the inner and outer facings. It would be best to attach the zipper flange to the inside of the facing first, then cut the steek, then trap when attaching the zipper/facing combo to the stabilized edge. You can use the zipper live-loop method, or the zipper chain-loop method, as explained in the zipper post. For live loops, draw the facing loops through the zipper edge, then continue the 3-in-1-trick as usual. With the chain-loop trick shown at the zipper post, you would draw the final slip stitch of the 3-in-1 steek trick through the chain made on the zipper, rather than through a live loop, inserting the crochet hook sideways--as soon as you go to try this (on a swatch!!) you'll see what I mean.
Needlepoint yarns are very long-staple pure wools which wear like iron, sold in little skeins or in cut lengths--get the skeins. These come in hundreds of colors. Even in skein put-up, needlepoint yarns have limited yardage, but for a facing, you don't need much yarn. Plus, being pure wool, needlepoint yarns take very kindly to being felted together (spit-spliced) end-to-end. Further, needlepoint yarns come packaged three strands together. These strands are easy to separate, so you can choose to knit with only two of the stands, or even just one strand, making for a thinner facing as well as greater usable yardage/skein.
For a contrast color (cc) facing, it's easy--choose a thinner yarn in a contrasting color--sock yarns are a good choice, or needlepoint yarns. The purl row through which the facing anchors recedes amazingly, a little canyon in the fabric. The cc color anchored along the bottom edge of this tight little canyon is almost invisible. You'd have to grab the fabric and stretch to see the cc dots at all. To absolutely avoid peep-through, pick up through the anchor column using a split of the mc yarn, then switch to the thinner cc in the first row of knitting. For the final step (the three-in-one trick from the previous post) you'd switch back to the mc yarn.
If you consider inserting a zipper my no-sew way, you'll see that the zipper flange fits very very neatly between the inner and outer facings. It would be best to attach the zipper flange to the inside of the facing first, then cut the steek, then trap when attaching the zipper/facing combo to the stabilized edge. You can use the zipper live-loop method, or the zipper chain-loop method, as explained in the zipper post. For live loops, draw the facing loops through the zipper edge, then continue the 3-in-1-trick as usual. With the chain-loop trick shown at the zipper post, you would draw the final slip stitch of the 3-in-1 steek trick through the chain made on the zipper, rather than through a live loop, inserting the crochet hook sideways--as soon as you go to try this (on a swatch!!) you'll see what I mean.
COLOR and YARN
If you really want a matching-color facing but can't find a matching color in a thinner yarn, consider harvesting thinner yarn by unspinning.
If you really want a matching-color facing but can't find a matching color in a thinner yarn, consider harvesting thinner yarn by unspinning.
Another option would be to use the main yarn for the facing, but knit on smaller needles. Certain wools compress surprisingly, especially lofty wools. However, tighter spun or thicker premium yarns do not compress as successfully. Either unspin to get thinner splits, or consider needlepoint yarns.
Needlepoint yarns are very long-staple pure wools which wear like iron, sold in little skeins or in cut lengths--get the skeins. These come in hundreds of colors. Even in skein put-up, needlepoint yarns have limited yardage, but for a facing, you don't need much yarn. Plus, being pure wool, needlepoint yarns take very kindly to being felted together (spit-spliced) end-to-end. Further, needlepoint yarns come packaged three strands together. These strands are easy to separate, so you can choose to knit with only two of the stands, or even just one strand, making for a thinner facing as well as greater usable yardage/skein.
For a contrast color (cc) facing, it's easy--choose a thinner yarn in a contrasting color--sock yarns are a good choice, or needlepoint yarns. The purl row through which the facing anchors recedes amazingly, a little canyon in the fabric. The cc color anchored along the bottom edge of this tight little canyon is almost invisible. You'd have to grab the fabric and stretch to see the cc dots at all. To absolutely avoid peep-through, pick up through the anchor column using a split of the mc yarn, then switch to the thinner cc in the first row of knitting. For the final step (the three-in-one trick from the previous post) you'd switch back to the mc yarn.
...and, the final trick of this post:
A METHOD for IMPROVING the TOP and BOTTOM of the STEEK
The top and bottom of the steek is the area with the most chance for cut ends to show, wear and eventually unravel in a potentially calamitous way. This is because the attachment of the facing and the outer fabric leave a gap at the top and bottom, and therefore provide the least amount of support for the cut ends in these areas.
If you want to put a steek into an already-knit garment, then you will have to resort to needle and thread to sew down the top and bottom right over the edge of the fabric. Then, either sew the bottom of the facing-fabric sandwich closed, or pick up stitches for the bands right through both layers (but not the cut edges) thus knitting the opening shut, as discussed above (continuous bands).
However, if you are knitting a garment with the purpose to steek it later, you can substantially improve the top and bottom of the steek if you are willing to do just a few rows of flat knitting before and after the circular (tube) knitting into which you will cut the steek. These few rows of flat knitting (back and forth) create a little notch at the top and bottom of the steek. Because the sides of this notch are ordinary knit edges (i.e.: not cut-edges) they will not (in fact, they cannot) unravel, and the problem is solved. When you do this trick, you still run the anchor columns all the way to the top and bottom, it's just the top and bottom of the steek itself which is notched.
A METHOD for IMPROVING the TOP and BOTTOM of the STEEK
The top and bottom of the steek is the area with the most chance for cut ends to show, wear and eventually unravel in a potentially calamitous way. This is because the attachment of the facing and the outer fabric leave a gap at the top and bottom, and therefore provide the least amount of support for the cut ends in these areas.
If you want to put a steek into an already-knit garment, then you will have to resort to needle and thread to sew down the top and bottom right over the edge of the fabric. Then, either sew the bottom of the facing-fabric sandwich closed, or pick up stitches for the bands right through both layers (but not the cut edges) thus knitting the opening shut, as discussed above (continuous bands).
However, if you are knitting a garment with the purpose to steek it later, you can substantially improve the top and bottom of the steek if you are willing to do just a few rows of flat knitting before and after the circular (tube) knitting into which you will cut the steek. These few rows of flat knitting (back and forth) create a little notch at the top and bottom of the steek. Because the sides of this notch are ordinary knit edges (i.e.: not cut-edges) they will not (in fact, they cannot) unravel, and the problem is solved. When you do this trick, you still run the anchor columns all the way to the top and bottom, it's just the top and bottom of the steek itself which is notched.
--TK
_____
**These buttonholes were made by simply pulling the live stitches through one another, each through the next, all the way around, then tacking off the last loop. You could also Kitchener-stitch the buttonholes closed, the front one to the back one.
**If making a steeked garment bottom-up, try the tube on BEFORE you get to the height of the armholes. If it turns out that it is going to be a bit tight, work your design so that the steeks for the armholes are placed in the correct location to make the garment BACK wide enough. In other words, the armhole slits will not be situated 180 degrees apart from one another, because the back will be wider than the front. After steeking, widen the front to match the back by adding front band extensions.
_____
**These buttonholes were made by simply pulling the live stitches through one another, each through the next, all the way around, then tacking off the last loop. You could also Kitchener-stitch the buttonholes closed, the front one to the back one.
**If making a steeked garment bottom-up, try the tube on BEFORE you get to the height of the armholes. If it turns out that it is going to be a bit tight, work your design so that the steeks for the armholes are placed in the correct location to make the garment BACK wide enough. In other words, the armhole slits will not be situated 180 degrees apart from one another, because the back will be wider than the front. After steeking, widen the front to match the back by adding front band extensions.