Another post deals with the actual (k)nitty-gritty--how to hold 4 (5?) needles with two hands, But for this post, we're not going to worry about how the stitches are cast on, or how they find their way from one needle to the next, or ladders, or any of that stuff. Today, we're just going to look at some stitches ALREADY ON the needles. Today...
THEORY of seamless tubes and circles 101
The traditional way of knitting small tubes or circles is with 4 or 5 double pointed needles (dpn's). But nobody has that many hands, and the thing looks horribly complicated. The alternate non-traditional method--using one very long circular needle--a method called "Magic loop"-- also looks complex.
Given how un-intuitive these methods seem, there must be a pretty good reason why they're so popular. What gives?
The WHY of DOUBLE POINTED NEEDLES
Double pointed needles (dpn's) allow knitting to choose its own natural diameter. This is true for pass-through tubes (sleeve) or dead-end tubes (hat, sock, mitten) or any flat circle (lace shawl, hat top). On dpn's these items all get to find their natural diameter without any stretching.Example: a tube of 44 stitches on four dpn's, means11 stitches on each of the four needles. Each SET of 11 just sits in the middle of its own personal needle, taking up exactly 11 stitches worth of needle-room. The stitches in each set never need to stretch their way down the length of the needle. Any unused lengths of needle just turn into naked needle ends sticking out PAST either end of the set. Result: the tube hangs from the needles in its natural shape, at its natural diameter.
This is because the naked needle ends on the dpn's are free to overlap one another as much or as little as necessary. That's what makes the dpn system so very flexible. On the illustration below, increasing by one stitch per set to 12 stitches on each of 4 needles, each needle would have less naked needle-end, and more of each needle would be taken up with stitches. The tube remains free to find its own diameter.
It all boils down to this: stitches on dpn's don't have to stretch ALONG the needle--the excess needle just sticks out. That means there's no gap between the stitches of one set. But, how about the gap BETWEEN sets?
click picture
The gap between stitch 11 and stitch 12 in the above illustration shows two needle ends sticking out of this gap. However, although there is a right angle bend between them, stitch 11 (the LAST stitch of one set) and stitch 12 (the FIRST stitch of the next set) aren't really any further apart from one another than if they were two stitches in the SAME set. In other words, they're just as close to one another as they would be if they were on the same needle. Knitted fabric is flexible, bends readily and easily accommodates the turn between sets of stitches, while the naked needle ends overlap as much (or little) as they need to, to keep adjoining stitches from different sets right next to each other. (Or, that's the theory, anyhow. In practice, ladders often form at these joins, but, that's a different post.)Bottom line: with dpn's, there is no stretching between stitches in the same set, nor between stitches in adjoining sets. The dpn's let the tube you're knitting find its own diameter, and any excess length of needle just sticks out PAST the stitches.
Of course, the whole thing looks like a porcupine, with all those naked needle ends sticking out. And that is especially so when you're just starting a center-start garment with a very few stitches. However, within that ferocious-looking nest of needle ends, the tube or circle lays very nice and tidy and most of all it lays peacefully UNSTRETCHED.
The WHY of a too-long circular needle (called "Magic Loop")
This trick was popularized in a booklet which named the technique "Magic loop" knitting. It came out around the same time as modern circular needles with well-attached and flexible cables. This technique is a needle-ruiner for older-type needles with stiff nylon cables. These kink or break at the cable-needle joint.
But why this trick did this trick even develop? It seems sort of odd to create a small seamless tube with a too-long needle. Why not just use an itty-bitty teeny circular needle in the first place? There ARE tiny needles meant for making little tubes, like 9-inch circulars. However, for many knitters, a needle that short is hard to manipulate. The needle tips have to be very short or the cable wouldn't be long enough to wrap around the back, so you have to hold the needle tips with your finger tips.
The deal is this: by popping two loops of cable out between two sets of adjacent stitches, the stitches separate into two sets in a flattened sort of tube. As with dpn's, disassociating the length of the needle from the amount of room each set of stitches takes up, allows the stitches in each set to sit unstretched, taking up exactly as much needle-room as needed.
Just the same way naked needle-ends protrude past the ends of the stitch sets in dpn's, so unused part of the cable needle protrudes in loops past the ends of the stitch sets in magic loop. Again, the tube can find its natural diameter without stretching around the circumference of the circular needle.
click picture
Between stitches 22 and 23, in the illustration above, the first loop of excess cable has been popped loose of the fabric, and between stitches 44 and 1, the second loop of excess cable has been popped loose. (Notice that the front set of stitches lies on the left needle tip, but the back set of stitches isn't actually on the right needle tip--it is on the cable. The right needle has been drawn all the way around, and is positioned ready to knit the waiting stitches off the left needle.)The cable loop which pokes out between sets is theoretically flexible enough so that stitches in adjoining sets are no further apart than stitches along the same needle in the same set, and the knitted fabric is theoretically flexible enough to take the 180 degree bend between the front and back set of stitches without distortion. In actual practice, there's usually distortion along the line between the front and back sets of stitches, especially if the fold line remains in one place through the whole project.
WHICH METHOD WHEN?
Personal preference rules. I find magic loop a perfect match for knitting things naturally used flat and doubled--classic ski hats, Christmas stockings. This is partly because the distortion along the fold line makes it a good match for objects which will stay folded, and partly because it's easier to visualize when the finished project is knit in the same shape it will be used.
For any other projects, I find magic loop slow. I'd rather not have to have to stop and re-arrange the needles twice on every round. For me, double pointed needles are much faster.
However, again, it's all down to preference.
* * *
This is part two of a five part series. The other posts are:
Why knit seamless tubes (first post)
Theory of seamless tubes on dpns and magic loop (this post)
Ski hat magic loop tutorial (third post)
How to knit with dpn's (fourth post)
Avoiding ladders with dpn's (fifth post)
